منابع مشابه
More on Quantifiers in Comparative Clauses
Goal: To give an explanation of the ban on downward entailing quantifiers (DE-Qs) in comparative clauses (c-clauses, cf. (1)) that is compatible with the solutions to the problem of quantifier 'scope' in c-clauses (cf. [I assume degree predicates are monotonic] (1)*Ann is taller than no/not all/few boys are. (2) Apparent generalization: B is F-er than Q is is true iff Q(λx. B is F-er than x is)...
متن کاملQuantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.
Language interpretation is often assumed to be incremental. However, our studies of quantifier expressions in isolated sentences found N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) evidence for partial but not full immediate quantifier interpretation (Urbach & Kutas, 2010). Here we tested similar quantifier expressions in pragmatically supporting discourse contexts (Alex was an unusual toddler. Most...
متن کاملDegree Variables by Choose Degree in Izyooni 'than'-Clauses
Clausal izyooni ‘than’-comparatives in Japanese allow izyooni ‘than’-clauses with their degree positons filled. I consider them a degree version of Internally Headed Relative Clauses (IHRCs). In this preliminary study, I adopt Gross and Landman’s (2012) Choose Role analysis of IHRCs in Japanese and propose a similar functional category Choose Degree, which “re-opens” a degree variable position ...
متن کاملUnsatisfiable hitting clause-sets with three more clauses than variables
Hitting clause-sets (as CNFs), known in DNF language as “disjoint” or “orthogonal”, are clause-sets F , such that any C,D ∈ F , C 6= D, have a literal x ∈ C with x ∈ D. The set of unsatisfiable such F is denoted by UHIT ⊂ MU (minimal unsatisfiability). A basic fact is δ(F ) ≥ 1 for F ∈ MU , where the deficiency δ(F ) := c(F ) − n(F ) is the difference between the number of clauses and the numbe...
متن کاملQuantifiers ∗
Quantifiers are terms of generality. They are also among our prime examples of operators which take scope. The distinction between singular and general terms, as well as the ways that general terms enter into scope relations, are certainly fundamental to our understanding of language. Yet when we turn to natural language, we encounter a huge and apparently messy collection of general terms; not...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Semantics and Pragmatics
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1937-8912
DOI: 10.3765/sp.3.1